The good with the bad
I'm through flying our Cirrus, at least for a while.
Our insurance company raised the minimum hours required to fly the airplane from 200 to 400.
I won't go too deeply into the absurdity of that move because it won't change a thing.
Suffice it to say I don't think it makes much sense. It's a simple airplane to fly and I'd argue it's the safest airplane in our club. (I think it's also the easiest airplane to fly, including the 172s.)
The avionics are excellent, the autopilot works extremely well and the gear is down and bolted, meaning there's not much to think about except for actually flying the thing.
What really bugs me is our insurance company doesn't require the normal Cirrus Standardized Instruction Program checkout to fly the airplane. Just a 5-hour checkout with an instructor. They also don't require an instrument rating, which makes no sense whatsoever.
How a commercial pilot with an instrument rating and 300 hours who flew 90 hours in the past 12 months is a greater risk than a typical private pilot with 400 hours who flies maybe 25 hours-a-year and doesn't have an instrument rating is simply beyond me.
Aviation's obsession with hours, as opposed to actual skill, has always rubbed me the wrong way.
Whatever. It's only another 100 hours and I don't really have the time or money to worry about flying the Cirrus right now anyway.
Now for the good.
I don't have the time or money to fly the Cirrus right now because we started working on the CFI today, which is looking to be more work than anything I've done up to this point in aviation.
It's also promising to be a whole lot of fun.
I say 'we' because I'm fortunate to be working with another student and two excellent instructors.
Christine just passed her commercial checkride and it's been a real eye-opener to train with somebody else. We both have different experiences, ideas and observations which means we wind up learning from each other as well as from our instructors.
All of my training up until this point has been essentially on my own, without the benefit of having another perspective.
I'd gone back and forth on where I'd do my CFI training. My initial plan was to head to Arizona and take a two-week accelerated course to get it over quickly, figuring I'd learn anything I might miss in such a whirlwind 'on the job.'
The upside was that it would go quickly. The downside was that accelerated programs have a controversial reputation. There are plenty of instructors who feel accelerated programs don't turn out very good flight instructors.
There are also plenty who feel it doesn't really matter where you get your CFI because most of what it takes to be a good instructor depends on your attitude and what you put into earning the license.
Ultimately, I decided to do the license locally. It will take more time but I think it will be well worth it.
Today we got started on the Fundamentals of Instruction with Cheryl and Aerodynamics with Linda.
They are my two least-favorite subjects. By far.
I'm starting to warm up to the FOI because I can finally relate the theory they cover with the actual experience of presenting a lesson.
As for aerodynamics, well, they're still a struggle. What has helped a bit is reading "The Illustrated Guide to Aerodynamics". It's actually a pretty easy read and about as interesting as it gets when it comes to explaining the more esoteric points of what makes airplanes fly, turn, climb and descend.
I'll also try my best to not instill any negative attitudes about insurance companies in my students. That'll be tough.


