Under Construction


There are Only Five Regular Solids

A regular solid is a polyhedron in which all of the edges, vertices, and faces are identical. I.e. the edges are all the same length, the same number of edges meet at each vertex, and the faces are all identical regular polygons.

The ancient Geeks used the following simple reasoning to find all the regular solids. The minimum number of edges in a face (i.e. a polygon) is three. After all, a polygon is defined as an area of a plane enclosed by straight line segments, and there is no way to enclose an area with only one or two edges. Similarly the minimum number of faces that can meet at a vertex is three - since there is no way to enclose a volume with just one or two faces at a vertex.

If you place three equilateral triangles around a vertex, the remaining opening can be filled with a fourth triangle. This gives you the Tetrahedron with four triangular faces and four vertices.

What if you try arranging four equilateral triangles around a vertex? You get a pyramid that is open at the bottom. If you add the additional triangles so that there are four faces around the vertices that bound the opening, you get the Octahedron with eight triangular faces and six vertices.

If you group five triangles around each vertex you get the lovely Icosahedron with twenty triangles and twelve vertices. If you try to put six triangles around a vertex you find that all the triangles lie in the same plane. With no curvature at a vertex there is no way the figure can ever be closed, so six or more triangles wont work.

Increasing the number of edges in the faces to four, of course yields a square. And three squares around each vertex of course gives you the all-too-familiar cube. Naturally if you put four squares around a vertex you once again have a plane that can't enclose space, so four or more squares will never work.

Once again increasing the number of edges in each of the faces to five, you will see that with three regular pentagons around each vertex you get a solid with twelve pentagonal faces and twenty vertices. This is the splendid Dodecahedron. Finally note that: 1) You can't fit four pentagons around a vertex. 2) Three hexagons around a point will all lie in the same plane, and 3) You can't even fit three regular polygons around a vertex if the faces have more than six sides.

Thus these five are the only possible regular polyhedra:

# of Faces

# of Sides in Each Face

# of Faces at Each Vertex

# of Vertices

Tetrahedron

4

3

3

4

Octahedron

8

3

4

6

Cube

6

4

3

8

Dodecahedron

12

5

3

20

Icosahedron

20

3

5

12

These are called the Platonic Solids, not because they only think of each other as friends, but because they were given their names by the Greek Philosopher Plato (427? - 347 B.C.).

Each Platonic Solid Has a Close Relative

If you place a new vertex in the center of each face of a polyhedron, connect each of those vertices to the corresponding vertices of the adjacent faces, and delete the original edges, you get a new polyhedron that is called the dual of the original. If you try this with the Platonic solids, you will see something interesting. The dual of Dodecahedron is the Icosahedron and the dual of the Icosahedron is the Dodecahedron. In other words the Icosahedron and the Dodecahedron are duals. Similarly the dual of the Octahedron is the Cube and vice-versa, so they are duals as well. Are you beginning to see a pattern? But that leaves only one Platonic solid. The dual of the Tetrahedron is... the Tetrahedron, but in a different orientation! Thus the Tetrahedron is the most special polyhedron of all. Not only is it the simplest, but it is also the only one that is its own dual.

You can see these relationships in the table of Platonic solids above. Since the dual operation creates one face for each vertex and one vertex for each face, it's like interchanging the # of Faces column with the # of Vertices column, as well as the # of Sides in Each Face column with the # of Faces at Each Vertex column.

Geodesics are Built by Subdividing Regular Solids

Geodesic Spheres Can Only Be Neatly Cut in Certain Places

Normally geodesic domes are made by subdividing the triangles of an Icosahedron. But if for example you want to build a half, quarter, or an eight of a full sphere, you need to start with a shape that can be evenly cut that way, such as an Octahedron or a triangulated Cube. Here is an example of a 5-frequency Octahedral Geodesic Sphere.

Note at the center you can see a 4-way vertex. There are six of these vertices in the entire sphere corresponding to the six vertices of the original Octahedron. All the other vertices were created by the subdivision process and are thus 6-way.

Geodesics Don't Have to be Spheres

Here is an example of a four-frequency Icosahedral geodesic paraboloid.

Geodesics Can be Made Out of Great and Small Circles


Bibliography

Unfortunately, to the best of my knowledge, there are no books in print on the subject of Geodesic domes. And the books and magazines that were published (mostly in the '70's) are very hard to find in used book stores and libraries. But if you need more information you can try to locate one of these sources. Or you can email me with your questions and I will try to address them in this page.

News Flash! This excellent book, originally published by the Cambridge University Press in 1979, is now back in print with a new Appendix added.

Wenninger, Magnus J. Spherical Models.. Dover Publications, 1999.

This book is one of the few that actually provides information on how to do the calculations needed to design a Geodesic dome.

Kenner, Hugh. Geodesic Math and How To Use It. University of California Press, 1976.

More information on woven domes can be found in this paper.

Edmondson, Amy. "The Deresonated Tensegrity Dome". Synergetica, 1 (4), pp. 1-9, November 1986.

I do not yet have a copy of this paper, but I am told by Peter Messer that it "...presents general mathematical formulas and their implementation to produce striking artistic geodesic-like spheres."

Wenninger, Magnus J., and Peter Messer. "Patterns on the Spherical Surface". International Journal of Space Structures, Multi-Science Publications, 11 (1-2), pp. 183-192, 1996.

And because one should give credit where credit is due, I must mention Bucky Fuller. Note that Bucky can be said to have "invented" the Geodesic dome only in the sense that Columbus "discovered" America. Nature has been building Geodesics all along (the eye of a fly, to cite one example), and a Geodesic dome was built in Germany in the 1920's. But it was Fuller's work that popularized the idea. This book is easy to find, but hard to read. Nevertheless it does document the process that Fuller used to develop his insights.

Fuller, R. Buckminster. Synergetics. Collier Books, 1975.

Home


Copyright © 2000 William A Ackel, All rights reserved.